Introduction and context
NQF snapshot
The Regulation on the procedures and principles concerning the implementation of the Turkish Qualifications Framework (TQF Regulation), was adopted by Ministerial Decision of the Council of Ministers and published in the Official Journal in November 2015.
The Description of the Turkish Qualification Framework (TQF Document) adopted by a Ministerial Decision of the Ministry of Labour and Social Security and published in the Official Journal in January 2016.
The Regulation on the Quality Assurance of Qualifications to be Included into the TQF, adopted by a decision of the TQF Coordination Council and published in the Official Journal in March 2018.
The Turkish qualifications framework (TQF) has eight levels and includes all types and levels of qualifications and certification.
Besides levels and level descriptors, the TQF defines qualification types and qualification categories.
The three-member TQF Coordination Council is the decision-making body of the TQF. Its members are high-level representatives of the three main responsible bodies of the TQF: the Ministry of National Education (MoNE), the Council of Higher Education (CoHE) and the Vocational Qualifications Authority (VQA).
Turkey is an EU candidate country and participates in the EQF advisory group. It referenced to the EQF at the March 2017 EQF advisory group meeting.
Educational, social, economic and political context
Turkey is an upper middle-income country of 80,3 million inhabitants, with a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of 850.7 $ billion, GDP per capita of US$ 10, 592, Life Expectancy at Birth, 75.4 years (2017). Turkey is a European Union (EU) accession candidate country. The EU accession process has been a significant anchor for socio economic reforms in Turkey. The EU is Turkey’s largest economic partner, accounting for around 40 percent of Turkish trade and 70-80 percent of foreign direct investment into Turkey is coming from the EU. Turkey has benefited significantly from deepening integration with the EU through the growing sophistication of both exports and imports and access to financing. Turkey is a member of the OECD and the G20, and an increasingly important donor to bilateral Official Development Assistance (ODA).
Although Turkey’s growth prospects have been reasonably robust, in the last years, Turkey’s economy has been fighting double-digit inflation and a falling currency, which all pose challenges to moving into high-income status. The influx of over three million Syrian refugees (2015–16) has created new social, economic, and political demands, placing a strain to education and training reform efforts.
Economic growth has stimulated job creation, but unemployment remains at 10.9%.Turkey has witness positive developments against the EU2020 targets. Considerable progress has been made especially on the EU 2020 twofold target on education (i.e. reducing the early leavers and increasing tertiary attainment) and adult participation in lifelong learning (albeit from relatively low levels). However Turkey continues to experience low rates of labour market participation and employment, high informality and precarious and vulnerable employment, which disproportionately affect young people. Despite the increasing activity and employment rates in the 20-64 age group, Turkey continues to lag behind EU averages. Graduates from secondary VET show better employment prospects as compared to those of general secondary education streams. VET is a viable education option for a large number of young people, VET enrolments, as a proportion of upper secondary education is high by almost 55. 8 %.
According to the OECD Education Policy Turkey Report [1], Turkey has made substantial progress in the area of education and human capital focusing on increasing equal access to primary, secondary, upper secondary ( general and VET) and tertiary education. The education system includes key policies to support students from disadvantaged groups, immigrant backgrounds and population subgroups, as well as students with special educational needs and those living in different regions within a country. However, gaps vis-à-vis OECD benchmarks remain very large. This is partly due to the quality of education lagging behind quantitative changes in school years. Equity and quality in education continue to be seen as a challenge by Turkey, which has set several key priorities, such as improving access and completion of upper secondary education, addressing the needs of disadvantaged students and improving equity between regions (especially between urban and rural areas). Providing education facilities and services to Syrians with temporary protection in Turkey is another key target reported.
Improving access to both VET and tertiary education is a key policy target for Turkey. There have been implemented key education policies (i.e. starting in 2015) that address the establishment of better links between educational levels and the labour market by allocated funding to support projects related to both professional teaching skills and students transitioning into the labour market. Other policies focus on updating qualifications to provide education orientation or transitions from lower to upper secondary education.
Turkey tracks the performance of its vocational graduates in the labour market through the E-graduate system. It has invested efforts in developing new processes of data collection, analysis and interpretation, and have strived to improve their inter-institutional cooperation to match supply and demand, assess effectiveness of education or employment policies etc. However, the mismatch between labour market demand and supply remains a constraint to growth and employability in Turkey. There is need to address high levels of skills mismatch, and many small entrepreneurs and workers need basic upskilling, as low skills inhibit the growth of productivity and incomes. Timely and relevant policy responses to the needs of young people are constrained by a lack of or insufficiently exploited data and information on transitions from school to work, on quality aspects of such transitions, and on vulnerable groups of young people. The mechanisms of skills needs identification and matching need to be consolidated and used for policy making.
Looking at the present delivery of the VET system in Turkey some forward-looking policy areas might be beneficial to look at in the context of Turkey. A more strategic approach is required, one that would include sharing of information among educators and digitally streamlined consultation with employers. Turkey skills panorama is being assessed through EU and OECD multi country analysis. Turkey can learn from the way some countries are addressing these emerging challenges. Digital technology is changing and will significantly change the way education and training is delivered in Turkey. Perhaps it is time to re-imagine them in view of the emergence of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the growing demand for ‘soft’ or ‘enterprise’ skills. One suggestion is to move away from narrowly defined qualifications built around specific roles or tasks towards broader qualifications, those structured around the concept of vocational streams. Vocational streams are clusters of occupations that share similar requirements for knowledge, skills and attributes. By focusing on the broader capabilities underpinning vocational streams, it is expected that youth job mobility, adaptive capacity and career development will be promoted.
For the Turkey economy to be competitive and inclusive, there is an increasing demand for a remodelling of VET delivery in the formal system. The skills profile of the current workforce and the growing demand for more highly skilled workers has become imperative. STEM skill set, which include science, technology design, engineering, mathematics, programming, systems analysis, critical thinking and computer use, should be part of the VET system. Courses and their associated qualifications will need to become more modular to allow them to be completed progressively and flexibly alongside work. Further, modular course offerings should serve as the building blocks for more long-term and continuous engagement between students, employers and VET providers. Maintaining currency with Turkey industry requirements is central to VET but is becoming increasingly challenging with the pace of change. Entrepreneurship should be added to the core skills and lifelong learning should become accessible to all. In view of the combination of technological change and longer working lives — during which time people may change careers a number of times and work for numerous employers — lifelong learning will be fundamental to future work environments. Education and training have never been more important.
Currently there is no published evidence of skills forecast and skills matching policies in Turkey. However, there changes are planned that need to be confirmed. A harmony between demand for the workforce in the labour market and supply offered by the education system was planned within the scope of the 65th Government Program. This included higher education with the "Transformation Program of High Priority on Development of Basic and Professional Skills" prepared within the framework of strengthening the education and employment relationship. (Ministry of National Education 2018 Performance Programme).
Harmony between the education system and the labour market is also planned within the scope of the 11th Development Plan 2019-2023. Making individuals acquire skills and qualifications that are required by the business sector, by taking the lifelong learning perspective as the starting point, by adoption of the entrepreneurship culture and strengthening school-business relations in vocational and technical education, taking medium and long term sector projections into account. (Ministry of National Education 2018 Performance Programme).
The Fourth Industrial Revolution brings far-reaching and accelerating disruptive change to business models and traditional education practices. For the government, it will entail innovations within education and labour-related policy-making. For the education and training sector, it will mean vast new business opportunities as it provides new services to individuals, entrepreneurs, organisations and the public sector. Is the system ready to face what the future brings?
Workers in Turkey use information-processing skills at work and in their daily lives however much less than do workers in other OECD countries [2]. National and international studies and surveys confirm that acquiring the right skills remains a challenge in Turkey. This is strongly corroborated by Turkey employers’ organisations. Turkey adults are considerably less likely to read, write, work with mathematics, solve problems and use computers in their jobs and in everyday life than is the case across other participating OECD countries. The employment rate remains well below the OECD average, despite a rise from its pre-crisis level, while the unemployment rate remains well above the OECD average.
According to the “Automation Readiness Index: Who is ready for the coming wave of automation?” of the Economist Intelligence Unit report, commissioned by ABB (June 2018) [3], unfortunately, there is not yet much evidence in Turkey of either policymaking or multi-stakeholder dialogue on this topic. There is not even evidence that there is any coordinated policy action which analysis/and or plan for the challenges of automation, its impact on the future of work and skills needed not only to match the needs but also to contribute to innovation, inclusive economic and social growth in Turkey. In assessing the existence of policy and strategy in the areas of research, innovation, education and training, labour market, the study finds that little/no policy is in place today in Turkey that specifically addresses the challenges of AI- and robotics-based automation. No policies, a part of some initiatives (e.g. by TUBITAK) is in place in areas such as curriculum reform, lifelong learning, occupational training and workplace flexibility.
Whatever the impact of intelligent automation on work and employment, it is clear that Turkey government must be prepared. There is no thorough evidence and no robust policy on the skills for the future of jobs in Turkey. It confirms a lack of dialogue between government and industry, as well as between different industries, on the skills forecast, skills matching including the challenges of automation. There is an urgent need for structural engagement between government, industry, educational specialists and other stakeholders if policymaking is to keep pace with skills for the future/innovation in automation.
Turkey submitted its fourth annual Economic Reform Programmes covering the 2018-2020 period[4].Turkey’s Economic Reform Programme and other related HRD national, EC and international strategic documents, all recognise the need for structural and governance reform in the HRD sector. National and international studies and surveys confirm that acquiring the right skills remains a challenge in Turkey. This is strongly corroborated by employers’ organisations. To realize its underlying growth potential, Turkey needs to accelerate structural reforms in education and training and employment and improve trust in its institutions. In particular, Turkey’s economic growth would benefit by upgrading and making better use of its human capital through the pursuit of the education agenda and the deepening and widening of labour market reforms. Specifically, the qualifications of low-skilled workers should be improved through training; female labour force participation should be stimulated through flexible working conditions. In order to address these challenges Turkey is invited to implement strategies to align education and training policies with labour market needs.
One major theme in the 11th Strategic Development Plan is the Digitalization (Industry 4.0). However, according to PISA 2016 results, Turkey ranked 52nd in science, 49th in mathematics, and 50th in reading skills among 70 countries. Given the coming digital transformation of the workplace and occupations, some policy discussion questions to be addressed urgently are: Which sectors will be growing? What will be their skill needs (Industry 2.0, 3.0, or 4.0)? How Turkey education system will respond for future employability of the youth? Youth employment is a remaining challenge. Aging is another concern. Can Turkey design employment incentives for the young, while also keeping older workers employed? Turkey skills institutions cannot avoid some of the key questions: Which sectors to invest for productivity by enhancing technologies (Industry 4.0), one can produce with fewer workers (aging); what happens to youth unemployment? Who gets or keeps the job? Who will be better able to adapt to digitalization of the workplace, the young or the old? In which occupations?
The large-scale technology/market changes occurring through technological advances such as automation, advanced robotics and virtualisation are already influencing the demand for both technical and soft skills in many occupations in Turkey, with some skills in decline and others in higher demand. Turkey’s socio economic development acquire policy discussions about the impact that technological developments/disruption will have on the Turkey present workforce and skilling for tomorrow. The various ways, by which the growth in technological advance is reshaping the labour market, workforce and jobs, needs to be examined and shared with all. These discussions cannot occur in isolation among educational platforms- private sector is a key partner for the intelligence on the skills required. The focus of discussions should be on the anticipated necessary skills from the perspective of both the innovators (technology producers) and industry (technology users).
Skills Foresight enhances such thinking by gathering anticipatory intelligence from a wide range of knowledge sources in a systematic way and linking it to today’s decision-making on how to deal with demographic change, health, social welfare, transport, energy, environment and climate change, community development, culture, human resources, and skills anticipation and education.
________________________________________
[1] EDUCATION POLICY OUTLOOK 2018: PUTTING STUDENT LEARNING AT THE CENTRE © OECD 2018
[2] OECD 2016- Survey of Adult Skills Technical Report (2nd Edition)
[3] The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2018. Please see the Automation Readiness Index which compares countries on their preparedness for the age of intelligent automation. The purpose of the Automation Readiness Index—to determine which countries are better positioned to take up the policy challenges that automation poses. Its attention is focused on three areas: on innovation policies that directly or indirectly support research into and business adoption of AI, robotics and other advanced technologies; on education policies that aim to develop the human capital needed to take advantage of these technologies; and on labour market policies needed to manage the workforce’s transition to a highly automated economy (For more detail, see chart “Index categories”).
[4] These were assessed by the European Commission and the European Central Bank. Based on these assessments, Joint Conclusions with country-specific policy guidance were agreed on and adopted by all seven enlargement partners and the EU in the annual Economic and Financial Dialogue held on 25 May 2018.To access to the latest Joint Conclusions on the Economic Reform Programmes:http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2018/05/25/western-balkans-and-turkey-joint-conclusions-of-the-economic-and-financial-dialogue/
Policy objectives
Education and training reforms
Improving access to both VET and tertiary education is a key policy target for Turkey. Many education policies have been implemented, based on strategies such as the Lifelong Learning Strategy (2014–18), the Vocational Education and Training (VET) Strategy (2014–18), the Higher Education Strategy (2007) and the Employment Strategy (2014-2023). Turkey’s lifelong learning strategy and Action Plan[2] pays particular attention to improving access to lifelong learning beyond the formal education system and promotes Validation of Non-Formal and Informal Learning (VNFIL). The Employment Strategy and its Action Plan[3] attributes a core role to the Turkish Qualifications Framework aimed at strengthening the link between education and employment and the quality of the VET system. The VET strategy focuses on broadening access to VET, with improved VET system capacity and better employment outcomes for graduates. The latter is also the goal for the Higher Education Strategy of Turkey (2007–25). Employment Strategy of Turkey (2014-2023) and its Action Plan[1] focuses on the National Framework for Qualifications with the aim to cover the university and non-formal education qualifications and the entrepreneurship. There is a whole chapter on the role of TQF for Strengthening the Link between Education and Employment focuses on the quality of the VET system. Its objectives include delivering qualifications as part of the Turkish Qualifications Framework (TQF), implementing curricula in compliance with occupational standards, developing information, guidance and counselling and accrediting VET institutions.
Turkey’s new lifelong learning strategy pays particular attention to improving access to lifelong learning beyond the formal education system and promotes Validation of Non-Formal and Informal Learning (VNFIL). Lifelong Learning Action Plan 2014-2018: http://hbogm.meb.gov.tr/str/files/LLL_ACTION_PLAN.pdf
In higher education, the implementation of the learning outcome approach is an essential part of the implementation of the NQF for higher education. However, current arrangements inhibit the validation of non-formal and informal learning in higher education.
According to the OECD Education Policy Turkey Report[4], Turkey has made substantial progress in the area of education and human capital focusing on increasing equal access to primary, secondary, upper secondary ( general and VET) and tertiary education. The education system includes key policies to support students from disadvantaged groups, immigrant backgrounds and population subgroups, as well as students with special educational needs and those living in different regions within a country. However, gaps vis-à-vis OECD benchmarks remain very large. This is partly due to the quality of education lagging behind quantitative changes in school years. Equity and quality in education continue to be seen as a challenge by Turkey, which has set several key priorities, such as improving access and completion of upper secondary education, addressing the needs of disadvantaged students and improving equity between regions (especially between urban and rural areas). Providing education facilities and services to Syrians with temporary protection in Turkey is another key target reported.
International cooperation
The Turkish National Action Plan for EU Accession was presented to Commission in March 2016 and lists the actions that Turkish authorities are planning to take up to 2019 in order to align with EU legislation and continue the reform agenda in education and training and the skills agenda.
The EU Education and Training 2020 priorities, the Bruges and Riga Mid-Term Deliverables (MTDs) and the new EU Skills Agenda are informing the Turkey skills agenda. Turkey has benefited from the Instrument for Pre- Accession (IPA II) funds beside national contribution to implement the policy options under each Riga MTD. Applications for the ERASMUS+ programme has increased in quantity focusing on implementing the Riga MTDs. There is a good level of exchange, implementation and learning from other countries, which is shared in the country. However, Turkey’s central structures need to be more strategic on how to build on all these developments/learning from their peers in EU MSs and beyond and mainstream them in the Turkish education and training system.
Turkey has a functioning system for the assessment and recognition of foreign academic qualifications in Associate’s, Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees that is supported by legislation and in line with the Lisbon Convention. The Equivalence office of the Council of Higher Education (CoHE/ YÖK) deals with recognition and equivalence requests in these degrees. CoHE is part of the ENIC-NARIC networks.
Many professions in Turkey are regulated. Requirements to execute a regulated profession in Turkey are defined in different laws. The Turkish Council of Higher Education has adopted a Regulation on the Harmonisation of the Minimum Training Requirements for the Seven Regulated Professions stipulated by the EU-Directive 2005/363. This should bring the minimum requirements for these seven regulated professions in compliance with the mentioned Directive.
VQA is responsible for the validation of the vocational qualifications held by foreigners who are seeking to work in Turkey. The VQA law speaks of validation, not of recognition. Principles and procedures in Turkish: https://www.myk.gov.tr/images/articles/editor/140613/MYK_yab_sert_dogrulanmasi_usul_esaslari_revize_web2.pdf
To execute a craft profession in Turkey one needs to have a master certificate. Foreigners can establish a business or work as an employee, if the equivalence of their certificate is recognised by the Ministry of Education (in addition they need a residence and work permit). Legislation involved: Law N° 3308 on vocational training (as amended by Law No 4702).
Levels and use of learning outcomes
Alignment to other classification systems
The TQF is the national instrument for classification of qualifications in Turkey. The higher education qualifications framework, which is a sub-framework within the TQF, is already functioning .
The Turkish Qualifications Database includes qualifications awarded in Turkey regardless of their quality. This means that the database currently functions as a qualifications inventory of Turkey rather than a register of the qualifications included in the TQF. In the database it is emphasized that the official levelling / inclusion of qualifications into the TQF has not started yet. The qualifications database includes all qualifications provided by the Vocational Qualifications Authority (VQA) and a high proportion of the qualifications provided by the Ministry of Education. There is only one higher education institute of which qualifications are included. The process of inclusion of higher education qualifications is There are 1633 qualifications in the Qualification Database as of August 2018. The database is accessible in Turkish and English.
NQF levels and level descriptors
The TQF has eight levels. In addition to levels, the TQF uses qualification types and qualification categories.
(a) Qualification types distinguish among qualifications that are at the same level but differ significantly in terms of their functions, learning outcomes, volume and/or orientations. Examples of qualification types are associate degree and level 5 vocational qualification certificate, at level 5; vocational upper secondary education diploma and skilled worker certificate, at level 4.
(b) Qualification categories classify qualifications according to their purposes:
- principal qualifications reflect comprehensive sets of learning outcomes achieved as a result of assessment after completion of a learning process, training programme or vocational training; as example, the vocational and technical high school diploma, marking the end of vocational and technical secondary education;
- supplemental qualifications are awarded for learning achievements additional to a previous principal qualification. They relate to updating and refreshing of knowledge or skills, or to continuing professional development and they can only be achieved on condition that a principal qualification is previously achieved as example level 6 vocational qualification certificate in Job and occupational counselling, achieved in addition to any bachelor degree;
- unit qualifications provide recognition for the achievement of a coherent set of learning outcomes that forms part of the combination of the overall requirement for a principal qualification. Unit qualifications are usually associated with modular learning programmes;
- special purpose qualifications are awarded for sets of learning outcomes that form a distinct, coherent achievement that may be used alone (such as license to work, license to start up business). These qualifications involve fewer learning outcomes compared to a principal qualification but they can be used as a license to operate. For example, level 3 vocational qualification certificate for Roller operation in the construction sector or level 5 vocational qualification certificate for Computer hardware in the IT sector.
The TQF level descriptors are described in terms of learning outcomes and use the following domains: knowledge, skills, competence.
- knowledge is defined as theoretical and/or factual knowledge requiring comprehension of facts, principles, theories and practices related to an area of work or learning;
- skill is defined as ‘utilisation of knowledge’ and ‘problem solving’, which requires the ability to use logical, intuitive and creative thinking and dexterity, method, material, tools and instruments acquired in an area of work or learning;
- competence is defined as use of knowledge and skills in an area of work or learning by taking responsibility and/or displaying autonomy, determination and satisfaction of learning requirements.
Table 1: TQF level descriptors
Source: Description of the Turkish Qualification Framework
Qualifications
The Vocational Qualifications Authority (VQA) Law no 5544 defines a qualification as the formal certification of knowledge, skill and competence possessed by an individual and recognised by the competent authority (VQA Law, Article 2-(1) h).
The TQF Regulation defines a qualification as the official document obtained when a competent body, at the end of a process of assessment and validation, recognises that an individual has accomplished the learning outcomes according to certain criteria (TQF Regulation, Article 3- (1) r).
Turkey does not use the term qualification standard but the TQF Regulation and TQF document define the term ‘Qualification type specification’ to describe the features of a qualification type. A qualification type specification includes:
- qualification type title;
- awarding body;
- orientation;
- level;
- category;
- credit range and typical duration programme;
- programme profile;
- learning environment;
- learning outcomes;
- key competences;
- assessment and evaluation methods;
- quality assurance;
- entry requirements;
- requirements for obtaining the qualification;
- progression paths;
- legal basis of the qualification.
Qualification type specifications have been drafted for all types such as bachelor diploma and level 3 vocational qualification certificate and submitted for consultation by the responsible bodies. The plan is to use these specifications while developing qualifications in specific types, so that the qualification bachelor in BA should be consistent with the qualification type specification of bachelor diploma.
Development process of qualifications
The Ministry of National Education (MoNE) is responsible for developing qualifications under its mandate. MoNE has launched secondary education curriculum reform for both general and vocational and technical schools. Vocational curricula are modularised and MoNE has a database of more than 4 000 modules that are also used for the licensing and certification of adult learning. There are also plans to establish a national credit system for VET. Although curricula are advanced, most initial vocational qualifications are not yet utilised and fully learning outcomes-based. Modules based on learning outcomes are used for learning, but they are not separately assessed and often lack an assessment component.
The Vocational Qualifications Authority (VQA) is responsible for development of qualifications under the national vocational qualifications system. Qualifications under the mandate of VQA are based on occupational standards and learning outcomes. Assessment, evaluation and certification for these qualifications is carried out by Voc-Test centres, authorised by VQA. These qualifications are classified under the qualification types vocational qualification certificate.
The Council of Higher Education (CoHE) coordinates and supervises the development of higher education qualifications awarded by higher education institutes. The higher education qualifications framework is a sub-framework within the TQF that is already functioning. National working groups for different fields of learning define common outcomes as a guideline for qualification and curriculum developers. A common register on the website of the higher education NQF provides links to specific programmes (website in Turkish and English).
Access, progression and credit
According to its Regulation, facilitating access to qualifications and progress between qualifications are main principles of the TQF.
The TQF Council has drafted a concept paper about credit transfer and accumulation. The preparation of the principles and procedures for horizontal and vertical progression between the qualifications in the TQF, credit transfer and accumulation is about to start.
The TQF proposes an evaluation and credit system associated with the workload that will allow credit accumulation and transfer. The proposed metric for the qualifications to be included in the TQF is 60 credits as the value ascribed to a learning period of 1 500 to 1 800 hours. This approach is compliant with both of the transnational credit systems in use in Europe, ECTS and ECVET. The regulating bodies will determine the credit range of the qualification types and the credit values of the qualifications. The principles and procedures for the credit transfer systems are planned to be developed by mid-2019.
Use of learning outcomes
Learning outcomes are the backbone of the TQF. According to the Regulation, the TQF is to ensure that qualifications are prepared based on learning outcomes. However, the shift to learning outcomes takes time.
National qualifications developed by VQA are based on learning outcomes. By mid-2018, VQA had published 451 national qualifications in 21 sectors.
For all of the VQA qualifications, modules used in the VET training programmes of MoNE are defined by learning outcomes. However, MoNE VET programmes have no separate qualification specifications defined by learning outcomes. This situation created a challenge while populating the qualifications database with qualifications. General education qualifications of MoNE are also not readily identified as defined by learning outcomes. In higher education, some universities have identified the qualifications they offer by learning outcomes but it is not easy to give an exact number. The process of transformation continues and the plan is to have all qualifications of MoNe and HEIs (higher education institutions) defined by learning outcomes until the end of 2018 at least on the Turkish Qualifications Database.
NQF scope and structure
The TQF is designed as an inclusive, comprehensive framework for classification of all quality-assured qualifications. The TQF primarily includes:
(a) qualifications awarded under the mandate of the Ministry of National Education (MoNE);
(b) qualifications awarded under the mandate of the Vocational Qualifications Authority (VQA);
(c) higher education qualifications awarded under the coordination and supervision of the Council of Higher Education (CoHE).
In time, the TQF will include other qualifications awarded under the mandate of certain responsible institutions.
Stakeholder involvement and institutional arrangements
Legal basis of NQF
The Regulation on the procedures and principles on the implementation of the Turkish qualifications framework (TQF Regulation) entered into force via Decision 2015/8213 of the Council of Ministers and publication in the Official journal dated 19.11.2015 and numbered 29537.
According to the Regulation, a three-year action plan for the implementation of the TQF has been developed by the TQF secretariat and approved by the TQF Council.
The Regulation on the Quality Assurance of Qualifications to be Included into the TQF was adopted and published in the Official Journal in March 2018 [1].
[1] https://myk.gov.tr/images/articles/TYC/TQF_QA_Regulation.pdf
Governance and institutional arrangements for the NQF
The 3-member TQF Coordination Council is the decision making body of the TQF. Its members are: the Deputy Minister of the Ministry of National Education (MoNE), the President of the Council of Higher Education (CoHE) and the President of the Vocational Qualifications Authority (VQA).
The TQF Coordination Council is assisted by the 22-member TQF Council, representing MoNE, CoHE, VQA and social partners’ organisations. The TQF Council addresses technical issues.
VQA is the responsible body for implementation and execution of the TQF. The TQF Department of VQA executes secretariat services for the TQF Council and TQF Coordinating Council.
TQF Coordination Council, TQF Council and the TQF Department have been established and are operational.
Main duties and responsibilities are described below.
The TQF Coordination Council:
(a) evaluates and approves procedures, principles, decisions, suggestions and opinions submitted by the TQF Council;
(b) collaborates with responsible bodies and institutions, international organisations, and the bodies and institutions of other countries.
Members of the Coordination Council are responsible for ensuring collaboration and coordination in the implementation of Coordination Council decisions within their bodies.
The TQF Council:
(a) prepares a three-year action plan for the implementation of the TQF and a communication strategy to raise national and international awareness of it;
(b) prepares principles, procedures, and criteria for a wide range of issues such as quality assurance of the qualifications to be included in the TQF, qualifications database, progress routes, credit accumulation and transfer, recognition of prior learning, updating, modification and cancellation of qualifications.
TQF Secretariat: secretariat services in relation to the Turkish qualifications framework are carried out by the TQF Department of the VQA.
The Secretariat:
(a) provides assistance to all the technical and administrative works of the Coordination Council and Turkish Qualifications Framework Council;
(b) drafts an action plan, annual work plan and activity report under the management of the Council;
(c) ensures the implementation of the Turkish qualifications framework communication strategy;
(d) establishes the qualifications database and ensures its update;
(e) prepares all kinds of research and analysis reports requested by the Chairman of the Council, or to conduct work and procedures for its preparation;
(f) performs other duties to be assigned by the Chairman of the Council.
Roles and functions of actors and stakeholders
The TQF Regulation foresees establishment of a consultation committee, with broad stakeholder participation, to evaluate issues and submit opinions regarding the framework. The committee will meet at least once a year. The VQA and the TQF Council are identifying which stakeholders should sit on the consultation committee. The Consultation Committee has been established. The list of the institutions to be represented in the committee was approved by the TQF Coordination Council at the meeting held on January 25, 2018.
Turkey has a system of sector committees, which is one of the cornerstones of the sustainability of the national vocational qualification system under the authority of the VQA. Sector committees are tripartite structures with State, employer and employee representatives; their establishment, duties and operation are regulated by law. 26 sector committees [1] are operational, sectors have been defined by VQA. These committees perform tasks related to development and maintenance of occupational standards and qualifications for their sector.
Resources and funding
The TQF Regulation stipulates that all expenditures arising from drafting, updating and roll out of the framework shall be covered by VQA. The Ministry of National Education, Council of Higher Education, and VQA shall designate personnel to work permanently at the TQF Department of VQA (Secretariat). The TQF department of VQA consists of one administrative staff, three assistant experts, one expert and one manager.
Erasmus+ funds are also being used. IPA-II funding for TQF implementation is expected in 2019.
Per diem allowances for Coordination Council and Council members attending meetings shall be covered by the responsible bodies.
Quality assurance of qualifications
A key statement in the TQF document is that "all quality-assured qualifications shall be included in the TQF.”
The Regulation on the Quality Assurance of Qualifications to be Included into the TQF regulates the QA procedures and principles to which qualifications must comply to be included in the TQF. This regulation is applicable to all qualifications offered in Turkey, whether achieved through formal education, non-formal education or an RPL/VNFIL procedure.
The regulation stipulates the Duties, Authorities and Responsibilities regarding the Quality Assurance and the Components of the Quality Assurance System:
- QA criteria
- QA paper and guidelines
- qualification form
- assessment and evaluation
- certification
- self-assessment and external evaluation
- regular review
- allocation of resources
- stakeholder involvement
- feedback mechanisms
- accessibility to the outcomes of the activities (through electronic information technologies)
Criteria for quality assurance are identified in accordance with Annex 4 of the EQF Recommendation 2017, the Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area for higher education qualifications, and the European Quality Assurance Reference Framework for Vocational Education and Training for vocational qualifications, as well as national quality frameworks for education that are in compliance with them.
The Regulation on the Quality Assurance of Qualifications to be Included into the TQF was adopted and published in the Official Journal in March 2018.
The TQF has three regulating bodies. MoNE, CoHE and VQA. Each is responsible for QA of the qualifications under its authority. For HE, the Higher Education Quality Board was established in 2015.
Quality assurance for the qualifications outside the scope of MONE, COHE, higher education institutions and VQA responsibility will be ensured by the institutions and organizations specified in related legislation.
TQF Coordination Council shall monitor continuous improvement of all quality assurance processes.
MoNE, CoHE and VQA are responsible for the quality assurance of qualifications under their authority. The qualifications under the responsibility of MoNE and CoHE mostly focus on academic and key competences, while the qualifications under the responsibility of VQA are developed focusing on employment and skills. Thus, the quality assurance systems of the institutions responsible for qualifications in Turkey have different procedures by nature.
The Council of Higher Education is an affiliated member of the European Association of Quality Assurance in Higher Education ( ENQA).
Recognising and validating non-formal and informal learning and learning pathways
VQA and the lifelong learning department of the Ministry of National Education are actively working to widen the validation of non-formal and informal learning in Turkey.
The 2014-2018 Lifelong Learning Strategy Document of MoNE promotes extensive use of Validation of non-formal and informal learning (VNFIL). MoNE has conducted two EU IPA Lifelong learning projects with VNFIL components. The LLL2 Project, completed in 2017, lays the foundation for the VNFIL system under MoNE's remit and provides organising principles and mechanisms for the identification, assessment and certification in relation to the qualifications under the authority of MoNE.
Turkey has implemented a system to assess, evaluate and certify skills of adults against national vocational qualifications. Assessment, evaluation and certification is executed by Authorised Certification Bodies (ACB, also called VocTest Centers). ACBs are authorized by VQA. In the last years, the number of ACBs has increased substantially, from 45 in 2016 to 170 by August 2018.
The TQF Regulation and TQF document include provisions for Recognition of Prior Learning, stipulating that all qualifications included in the TQF can be attained via recognition of prior learning (RPL) / validation of non/formal and informal learning (VNFIL).
Learners will have the following possibilities through the recognition of prior learning:
(a) access to programmes;
(b) access to exams;
(c) exemptions;
(d) certification of units;
(e) credit accumulation and transfer;
(f) recognition of qualifications.
The TQF Coordination Council will prepare guidelines for principles and procedures on RPL/VNFIL. This will be a general VNFIL framework like the EU Recommendation 2012. The responsible bodies shall be responsible for application of these principles and procedures for the qualifications under their authority. The principles and procedures are planned to be prepared at the end of the 2018.
VNFIL has been legally introduced to the Turkish higher education system in 2011 but is still in a starting phase. The country has an operational system to assess, evaluate and certify adult skills against national vocational qualifications. Assessment, evaluation and certification are carried out by certification bodies authorised by VQA (so-called Voc-Test centres). By August 2018 the country had 170 authorised centres and numbers are increasing. VQA certification has become compulsory for 81 hazardous occupations, which puts a strain on the capacity of the system.
For the qualifications under the authority of MoNE comprehensive updates have been made in the VNFIL legal framework. Amendments of the VET Law (3308, dated 2 December 2016, and adopted by the Parliament) stipulate that “the vocational qualifications related to prior learning, are defined based on the occupational standards and their levels and assessed by testing. The VNFIL and accreditation principles will be defined by a regulation issued by MoNE”. On the 2nd of October 2017, MoNE issued the regulation on the principles and implementation of VNFIL, regarding accreditation, measurement and evaluation. On 26th March 2018 revisions were made on the regulation on secondary education to include VNFIL in the system.
VNFIL was established in the higher education system in 2011 but is still in its early stages.
Turkey has a highly developed system of distance learning. Most stages in formal and non-formal education can be reached by distance learning and open education options.
NQF implementation
Inclusion of qualifications in a register
The TQF does not yet include qualifications since realisation of the QA is a priority for qualifications to be included into TQF. Therefore the QA Regulation has been adopted. The Regulation envisages the establishment and implementation of the QA systems by April 2020. The principles and procedures for the inclusion of the qualifications into the TQF are being drafted. Following the adoption of the principles and procedures, the quality assured qualifications can be included into the TQF, expected in 2019.
Monitoring, evaluation and review of the NQF
Monitoring the effectiveness of TQF implementation will be the mutual task of the TQF Coordination Council and the TQF Consultation Committee. The Consultation Committee has been established and planned to be held in Q4 of 2018 or Q1 of 2019.
Impact for end-users
Legal arrangements for the TQF are in place and the implementation of the TQF is in process. A qualifications database is operational. The TQF does not yet include qualifications since the realization of the QA is a priority for qualifications to be included into TQF. Therefore the QA Regulation has been adopted. The Regulation envisages the establishment and implementation of the QA systems by April 2020. The principles and procedures for the inclusion of the qualifications into the TQF are being drafted. Following the adoption of the principles and procedures, the quality assured qualifications can be included into the TQF, expected in 2019.
The ACB/VOC-Test Centers that assess, evaluate and certify skills of adults have impact for end users. By August 2018 these centers have issued over 387.000 certificates to individuals that now have a recognized national vocational qualification.
Referencing to regional frameworks
Turkey is an EU candidate country and participates in the EQF advisory group. The EQF referencing of the TQF was completed in the spring of 2017.
Important lessons and future plans
The institutional arrangements for the TQF have been very much focused on and around VQA. Coordination of the TQF will be shared between stakeholders, in a similar way that the VQA executive board has been functioning. The VQA experience has greatly contributed to the developments so far. MoNE and the CoHE will play a more prominent role in the implementation of the TQF. VQA is supporting the implementation of the TQF, but is also one of the three regulating bodies and will establish a system for quality assurance of provision. The accumulation of these different tasks within a single institution is not easy to manage, particularly if the system is starting to grow more rapidly. The numbers of authorised certification bodies, providers and qualifications is increasing, as VQA certification is becoming compulsory for certain qualifications.
Development of the TQF as an integrated structure is a huge step forward from the previous position where the national vocational qualifications system operated as a parallel structure, focusing on the certification of adults. The responsibilities of VQA, MoNE and CoHE are becoming clearer but the new QA regulation defines the division of QA responsibilities based on a common set of QA criteria. Implementation of the QA regulation will be decisive in determining the ultimate division. Sectors have been actively involved in developing national occupational standards and qualifications and are volunteering to become authorised certification bodies, but there is a need to support the establishment of these bodies, to allow the system to grow fast enough to meet the expectations. Training which can lead to qualifications is a next challenge. The role of the sectors in initial and post-secondary VET (MYOs) and possibly HE has to be clarified. There is interest from the private sector in using the TQF to make qualifications more relevant. Many training providers provide adult learning courses. The Istanbul municipality, as an example, is offering hundreds of courses, free of charge, for more than one million participants. These courses are based on programmes of MoNE, with a MoNE course completion certificate awarded. The municipality is doing this through a protocol with MoNE. Bringing such courses into the TQF by mapping them against the outcomes of units of VQA or MoNE qualifications is one process currently being considered to quality assure and certificate them within the framework of the TQF.
Abbreviations
CoHE Council of Higher Education
IPA Instrument for Pre-Accession, the EU’s support programme for candidate and potential candidate countries
İŞKUR Turkish Employment Agency
MoNE Ministry of National Education
MYOs post-secondary colleges, offering VET and general education; offer higher education short-cycle qualifications; administered by CoHE
NEETs young people aged 15 to 24 who are neither in employment nor in education and training
ODA official development assistance
QF-EHEA qualifications framework in the European higher education area
TURKAK Turkish Accreditation Agency
TQF Turkish qualifications framework Voc-Test centres certification bodies that are
authorised by VQA
VQA Vocational Qualifications Authority
Please log in or sign up to comment.