In August 2020, the European Training Foundation in partnership with Omnia,  launched a baseline study analysing what and how Centre’s of Vocational Excellence (CoVEs) autonomy is operationalized and can be linked to PPP experiences in some ETF selected countries and CoVEs. The baseline study, finalised in December 2020, is based on desk-research, online survey and interviews that took place during August-November 2020 with CoVEs representing six ETF partner countries (Azerbaijan, Israel, Georgia, Morocco, Tunisia and Turkey) and two European Member States (Finland and the Netherlands). Though implemented in a small scale, the study provides interesting findings from both practitioners and policy-makers point of view.

The survey consisted of several parts pertaining to CoVE autonomy and administration, structuring and focus of PPPs, main focus and benefits of partnerships. The CoVEs reviewed in the study had similar features and patterns of co-operations with the private sector despite their diverse country contexts and different legislative, cultural, and historical background in vocational education and training. They operate mostly regionally and typically in multiple sectors not limiting their activities to any specific industry sector.

The survey mapped autonomy on different levels;

1)general CoVE management,

2)human resources

3)pedagogy

As illustrated in figure 1 (attached), one key finding of the study was that CoVEs can mostly decide autonomously on the level and forms of public-private cooperation. In fact, a high number of PPPs was seen as a specific feature that distinguishes a CoVE from other VET providers. CoVEs also tend to be more accountable and operate more like a private company in their daily management, thus the competence of CoVE management is of great importance.

The studied CoVEs portray an array of cooperation modes with companies to support student’s skills development; work-based learning (WBL), including planning, working & learning and assessments of students in PPPs.This cooperation can even be mandatory

The study also shows that CoVEs’ cooperation with the private sector is multi-dimensional and covers several development areas of education-business collaboration. The multiple dimensions range from HR development and trainings to cooperation in employability, employment, recruitment, career guidance, mentoring and scholarships, to higher VET, anticipation of skills need and tracer studies, master classes and top specialist trainings, to the development of techno entrepreneurship, start-up projects and international development projects.

CoVEs can be seen as partners supporting the companies’ recruitment needs, providing trained manpower. At best, the CoVEs know the private sector’s most recent and urgent needs and can prepare future professionals accordingly. On the other hand, the added value for the companies is the possibility of upgrading of their employees' skills through CoVEs’ continuous and professional training on companies’ request. Other benefits that CoVEs receive from public-private cooperation are related to innovation; supported research and development, innovation partnership and continuous quality improvement of VET programs.

The study confirms that sustainability of partnerships is ensured with the close integration of companies into the educational process. PPPs play an important role in mid-term and long-term VET development. Cooperation needs to happen on several levels and can take the form of ongoing partnership councils, joint working groups, development of protocols etc. CoVEs are pioneers and require sufficient autonomy to design and implement PPP models, sharing good practice and scaling innovation to all VET providers.

The baseline study and the policy briefing will be published on ETF website in the coming months.

Files

Comments (2)

Maria  Salervo
Open Space Member

In Finland, the law actually requires that VET providers establish an ecosystem with the private sector to implement work-based learning in all VET qualifications. Omnia, for instance, has established partnerships with up to 3000 companies in the region it operates in.

Chahine Mahfoudh
Open Space Member

Tout en vous remerciant pour le partage Floriana, j'aimerai commenter le cas Tunisie.

Comme l'illustre le graphique, les Centres de formations Tunisiens ne dispose pas d'une grande part de décision dans la question du PPP, l'ingénierie législative tunisienne est à caractère super-protecteur dans le sens où elle vise à élargir les interactions de ses organes d'exécution (les centres) avec leur écosystèmes sectoriels et régionaux, sans pour autant céder leur gestion (ni totalement, ni partiellement) au secteur privé.

Les professionnels sont bien présent aux "conseils de partenariat" des centres de formations, tout comme les représentants des partenaires sociaux, mais ces conseils à caractère consultatif n'influencent partiellement que l'axe technique de la formation (flux des formés, contenu des programmes d'étude, lancement de nouvelles formations, ...), malgré que depuis 2005, les modes exclusifs de formation sont ceux qui implique directement les entreprises économiques dans l'action de formation (l'alternance et l'apprentissage).

Faire profiter les Centres de formation d'une gestion administrative et financière privée est malheureusement une question très délicate dans le contexte tunisien actuel, la réforme du dispositif national est basée, entre-autre, sur cette notion d'autonomisation des centres, mais le constat aujourd'hui est que le volet gestion des ressources humaines ainsi que tout ce qui touche aux budgets de fonctionnement ou d'investissement reste centralisé et concentré.

Au final, je ne trouve pas meilleure recommandation que celle extraite de la cartographie de la gouvernance de la FP en Tunisie, réalisée par l'ETF : "La délégation des pouvoirs et des responsabilités doit se traduire par la mise en œuvre d’une véritable autonomie des établissements quant aux contenus des formations et à l’organisation pédagogique sur la base de procédures de gestion et de financement flexibles."

https://www.etf.europa.eu/sites/default/files/m/F1450C82586B87B9C1257E7…


Please log in or sign up to comment.