Introduction and context
NQF snapshot
The Georgian national qualifications framework (NQF) was adopted by ministerial decree in 2010. In 2017-2018 a major revision of the NQF took place, to improve coherence and better linkages between the sub-systems (general education, VET and higher education) and compatibility with the European Qualifications Framework (EQF). As a result, in October 2018 the Parliament adopted the NQF-related amendments to the Law of Georgia on Development of Educational quality, setting the main objectives and principles of the new NQF. The ongoing reform of the NQF is expected to deepen the coherence with the 2017-2018 reforms of the education quality assurance system, enhance transparency and evidence based decision-making on the NQF implementation, and support inclusion of quality-assured qualifications for lifelong learning awarded outside of the formal education sector.
The National Centre for Education Quality Enhancement (NCEQE) is in charge of managing NQF implementation, reviewing and updating the legal basis and monitoring its impact. The NQF and the education and training quality assurance framework are closely linked.
Georgia has participated since 2005 in the Bologna process, but has not yet presented a self- certification report. It is at the structured stage of NQF development.
Educational, social, economic and political context
According to the 2014 Census the population was 3,729,635 (as of January 2015), which shows a striking decrease (by 14.7%) compared with 2002. High emigration, as well as the Russian Federation’s aggressive military actions and annexation of Georgian territory justify this situation. Over 57% of the population is urban, and Tbilisi alone has 30% of the whole population. The share of the age group 15-24 slightly declined to 20.2% in 2015.
The country has been participating in several rounds of international students’ assessments, and results help decision-makers and the education community orient the focus of reforms and continuous improvement. Georgia was among the 21 countries that improved their average achievement in Mathematics in the 2015 round of Timss 4th grade, and ranked 37 (out of 49) with 463 points (618 was the top performance). The country’s average achievement in Timss science 4th grade (2015) remained unchanged and Georgia ranked 39 (out of 47), with 451 points (590 was the maximum). In Pisa 2015 Georgian 15 years olds visibly improved their average scores in all three subjects (science, reading and mathematics), nonetheless more and consistent effort will be necessary to decrease the “share of low achievers in the three subjects” (country result was 36.3) and to elevate the average score in each of the three subjects.
The population of Georgia has relatively high educational attainment (62.1% have ISCED 97 level 3-4 and 33.5% - have level 5-6). Younger age groups have expanded participation in higher education, however with equity divides (based on e.g. income, urban-rural residence).
The Government has implemented unstable policies towards vocational education and training in the last 10 years, but since 2014 there has been a clear reorientation to promote and reinforce the VET system, through increased public expenditure, extensive reforms to modernise curriculum and teaching and to widen access. The share of upper-secondary students in VET has increased, but remains way too low, when compared with the other Eastern Partnership countries.
The STEP survey of the World Bank [1] identified the most important employability skills that young workers lack most often. Only those skills are shown which are reported as missing among young workers by at least 25% of firms. Occupation specific technical skills are considered critical for employability by employers, and at the same time a high proportion of firms says that young workers frequently lack them. Workers also often lack higher-order cognitive skills (problem solving) and some key socio-behavioral skills (problem solving, ability to work independently and in teams). Another source [2] reveals that skills on demand are: analytical, communication, interpersonal and digital skills. Employers also value teamwork and a flexible “Can do” attitude. Recent national employers’ survey shed light on the factors behind the perceived hiring difficulties, among which – skill mismatch (by field of study, level of qualification), but also unattractive employment conditions (wages).
Georgia has adopted and implements a number of strategies and policies targeting various angles of competitiveness, employability and inclusion, notably the National VET Strategy (2013-2020) and the Labour Market Strategy (2013-2024) with associated actions plans. Regular labour market (employers) surveys are carried out from 2015 under the umbrella of the Ministry of Labour, Health and Social Affairs, to identify trends in demand for skills and prospective employment.
In 2014 Georgia put in place the “Georgian National Youth Policy”, aiming to encourage establishment of the relevant environment for comprehensive youth development, enabling youth to fully fulfil its potential and be actively involved in any sphere of social life. The national youth policy is supported by an Action plan (to 2020) and covers multiple dimensions: participation in social, cultural and political life; high quality education and training, employment and professional development; healthy life style, and friendly environment for youth. The Ministry of Sport and Youth Affairs of Georgia plays the leading role in coordinating youth policy. Moreover, the public employment service (Social Service Agency) implements training programmes for unemployed / job seekers and promote career guidance via an online portal.
In February 2017 the European Parliament approved Georgia visa waiver, which brings Georgia closer to the EU. The visa waivers apply to all EU member states (except Ireland and the UK), plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland.
Economic context
Georgia is a lower-income country with a growing GDP per capita reaching $9,379 in 2015 (purchasing power parity, current international dollars).
The geopolitical context affects growth in the Eastern Partnership, Georgia’s economy remains resilient to shocks and is the only one for which the World Bank leaves positive predictions of growth unchanged. Georgia is among the best performers among the countries of the Eastern Partnership as far as GDP growth is concerned (4.6% in 2014 and 2.7% in 2015).
Small and medium enterprises represent 96% of all enterprises, but their contribution to GDP is relatively modest (21.1% in 2014). Over two fifths of the employed are in SMEs (2014).
Tourism is one of the dynamic sectors of the economy and continues to grow, contributing 23.5% to GDP and 20.1% employment (direct and indirect in the sector). The share of agriculture in GDP slightly decreased to 9.2% in 2015, while the contribution of the industry increased to 24.5%. The services sector contributes 66.3% to GDP and maintains its predominance.
Georgia ranked 66 (out of 144) in the Global Competitiveness Report of the World Economic Forum. According to the Doing Business 2017 report, Georgia is ranked 16th among 190 nations. In the previous year’s report (2016), Georgia held the 24th position among 189 countries. Georgia has improved its positions in many categories, particularly in terms of institutional structure and regulatory environment. However, major weaknesses remain, such as lack of support for research and education by the government and the private sector, and limited use of innovation in business.
Labour market indicators
Georgia’s labour market indicators show continuous improvement in the last years, but challenges persist that will require the continuation of coherent policies to promote job creation, to minimise qualifications mismatch and support access to timely labour market information for all job seekers, employers and learners.
The employment rate has increased by 5.6 percentage points between 2010 and 2015 (68.8%), but youth employment (age group 15-24) remains nonetheless modest (27.3%). The unemployment rate declined visibly by 4.3 percentage points (12% in 2015) in the same period, but youth unemployment (15-24) remains a challenge (30.8%). The proportion of long-term unemployment is not the highest among the Eastern Partnership countries, but deserves continuous attention (42.7% in 2015), given the known adverse impact on people’s skills and motivation to stay in the labour market.
The rate of persons not in employment education or training (age group 15-29) is of concern, but in the period 2013-2015 Georgia shows a visible improvement, with a reduction of over 9 percentage points of the total NEETs rate). However we notice that unlike other countries of the Eastern Partnership, the NEETs rate of Georgian young women exceeds by 14 percentage points the rate of young men.
[1] World Bank (2013), Workforce skills in the Eyes of the Employers – results of the Georgia STEP Employer Skills Survey
[2] ILO, Enabling Environment for Sustainable Enterprises (Georgia)
Policy objectives
Education and training reforms
As a country which is undergoing a transition from the former Soviet system to a market economy, Georgia is implementing reforms in education and training, qualifications and employment policies aimed at simultaneously addressing growth and competitiveness, employment and social inclusion. Social policy objectives and renewed attention to employment have been reinforced since the 2013 elections. Unemployment has been a high priority for the new government, as the steady economic growth in the past decade has not been accompanied by commensurate job creation.
Stakeholders have high expectations of the NQF as a catalyst for implementation of essential reforms in education and training. The socioeconomic context justifies the emphasis placed on employability, and continuing reform of education and training contribute to this. The NQF in action is expected to contribute to improving permeability between subsectors, to helping match qualifications and labour market needs, to supporting quality assurance of education and training, and increasing the transparency of learning outcomes.
In October 2018 the Parliament adopted the major legal act of the new NQF, as an amendment to Law of Georgia on Development of Quality of Education. In addition, four main subordinate acts are ready for approval in 2018, as ministerial orders. A closer look at the new legal base is provided in section 4. Legislation.
1. A new section dedicated to the NQF in the Law of Georgia on Development of Quality of Education [3] (amendment to the Law): chapter IV2. The three articles cover:
- o NQF and its goals
- o Management and development of the NQF
- o Classifier of fields of study
2. An Order of MESCC on the new NQF and its structure, level descriptors and typical qualifications by level
3. An Order of the MESCC and Science on the new Classifier of Fields of Study, based on ISCED-F 2013
4. An Order of MESCC on governance and monitoring of the NQF.
According to the first document - amendment to the Law on Development of Quality of Education - the goals of the draft new National Qualifications Framework will be as follows (article 24)[4] :
a) “Classification of qualifications by protection of the following key principles of the National Qualifications Framework: compliance of learning outcomes, quality assurance, availability of qualification-related information;
b) Interconnection of general, vocational and higher education, its management and development;
c) Promoting lifelong learning;
d) Supporting quality assurance system;
e) Ensuring compatibility, comparison ability and transparency of qualifications at international level;
f) Promoting mobility;
g) Supporting recognition of formal education obtained during learning period;
h) Supporting recognition of informal education;
i) Providing public with information on current qualifications;
j) Reflection of permanently changing requirements in the education system and stimulation of renewable qualifications description relevant to it”.
Comparing with the NQF 2010, this set of goals reflects a renewed vision of the NQF, which will now explicitly be open to such novel topics as: non-formal education; transparency in understanding the professional profiles for all types of users; responsiveness to changing requirements and renewal of qualifications. The new NQF is increasingly seen as a bridge between the sub-sectors of formal education, as well as between formal and non-formal learning.
[3] Current (not yet amended) version of the Law available at: http://eqe.gov.ge/res/docs/2014120816015474706.pdf
[4] According to the non-edited translation of the amended Law, as of December 2018
International cooperation
Georgia has been a full member of the Bologna process since 2005 and participates in the ministerial meetings and regular reporting. The EU-Georgia Association Agreement was signed on 26 September 2014 and entered into provisional application from September 2014. Its Chapter 16 refers to cooperation towards recognition of qualifications. Annex XXXII lists the acquis to be adopted by the country, including the EQF Recommendation. Article 96 refers to mutual recognition (negotiation of mutual recognition agreements) [5].
Georgia ratified the Lisbon Recognition Convention in 1999. NCEQE represents Georgia in the ENIC-NARIC Network. Department of International Education of the Center is responsible for providing the representatives from ENIC-NARIC Network with the relevant and reliable information about Georgian education system as well as Georgian educational institutions and credentials. NCEQE closely cooperates with the ENICs and NARICs in the process of recognition of foreign education in Georgia.
[5] https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/association_agreement.pdf
Levels and use of learning outcomes
Alignment to other classification systems
All occupational standards are linked with the national classification of occupations, based on ISCO-08. The approved template for occupational standards includes a field for the relevant code from ISCO-08.
The new Classifier of fields of study is one of the legal acts following the adoption of the NQF-related amendments to the Law on Development of Education Quality. This new Classifier is in the approval process. It is structured in accordance with ISCED-F 2013.
NQF levels and level descriptors
The new NQF has three categories of descriptors: Knowledge and understanding, Skills and Responsibility and autonomy. The new NQF is structured in eight levels. The first and second levels of the 8-level qualification (new NQF) include the programs for development of key competences for those adults, who have not received mandatory 9-year general education. By the completion of the mentioned program they will have the opportunity to continue their learning on the third or fourth levels of vocational educational programs. The basic education of general education (ninth grade certificate) is placed on the second level of the framework.
Qualifications at level 1 require General Basic Knowledge, Basic skills to perform simple tasks. Identification of simple tasks and ability to evaluate and solve them; Basic skills of using books and mathematical literature, oral and written communications, information technologies; In a homogenous environment, communication and exchanging of information on simple issues in foreign language.
Qualifications at level 2 Basic factual knowledge in the field of learning and activities; Basic cognitive and practical skills for the use of relevant information in the field of learning and / or work, simple tasks and methods to perform tasks and to solve routine problems. The ability to understand their own and others' actions, adapt to new situations, verbal and written communications and argumentative discussions about familiar activities. Ability to find, process, store, share and analyze information using information and communications technologies on specific issues
Since the new NQF acts a system reform instrument, particularly important to minimize existing dead-ends between VET and higher education pathways and qualifications, certain qualifications are yet to be developed and assigned to the new NQF structure.
Qualifications from formal vocational education are placed on the third, fourth and fifth levels of the framework. The program of general education is integrated in the secondary vocational program of the fourth level, which gives the right to an individual holding the ninth grade certificate to add the learning outcomes of the vocational diploma with equal level to the 12th grade certificate (NQF Level 4). This is very important reform, but issues remain as to the practical reorganisation of this new secondary VET qualification of NQF level 4.
Qualifications at level 3 requires knowledge and interpreting basic facts, principles, processes and general concepts characteristic of learning and / or field. The combination of analytical and practical skills for solving tasks and solving problems, using appropriate information, tools, selection of materials and basic methods. Evaluation of its activities in relation to the relevant standards; Oral and written communication on issues related to studies and activities; Use of relevant information and communication technologies; Communication in everyday, familiar issues in foreign language, including terminology related to the field of activity.
Qualifications at level 4 require wide context of actual and theoretical knowledge characteristic of learning and / or activities. The combination of cognitive and practical skills required to solve specific problems that are characteristic of learning and / or activities. Seeking information to solve specific problems, its critically analysing, selecting appropriate approach, reviewing alternatives and reasoning; oral and written communication on general issues, including relevant information and communication technologies, as well as in foreign language
Qualifications at level 5 require specialized, comprehensive and theoretical knowledge and understanding of its capabilities (boundaries) in the field of learning and / or activities; applying wide-range cognitive and practical skills to solve individual problems creatively; identification, analysis and evaluation of clearly defined abstract and concrete problems data. Structural and consistent transmission of ideas and information by using qualitative and quantitative information for specialists and non-specialists. Use of modern information and communication technologies.
In Georgia level 5 qualifications have seen a relatively good pace of development. 30% of all new VET qualifications adopted between 2015 and 2018 are of level 5. As of December 2018 the total number of approved quality assured modular VET programmes included in the register is 97, in 62 sectors and 3 NQF levels (3, 4 and 5).
The higher education program of the fifth level will be a short cycle qualification (associate degree), which will be connected with the first level educational program of higher education. The credits of short cycle qualifications will be recognized for the goals of Bachelor and integrated Master programs. The volume of short cycle qualification is 120/180 credits.
Higher education qualifications are placed on the sixth, seventh and eighth levels of the NQF. These levels are not open for other types of qualifications, such as from certain professional bodies, but only for quality-assured academic qualifications.
Qualifications
The amended Law of Georgia on the development of educational quality defines “Qualification” as a formal result of evaluation and approval of a learning outcome that is asserted with a state-recognized certificate, state document confirming higher or vocational education - diploma, or state document confirming general education. This definition applies to qualifications from all sub-sectors: general, vocational and higher education.
The new VET Law (2018) defines qualifications as follows:
“Qualification - formal outcome of assessment and confirmation of the achievement of the learning outcome by the authorized institution (s) which is confirmed by State-recognized Certificate, by the state document confirming higher or vocational education – Diploma, or by the state document certifying the general education”.
Educational standards differ according to education sub-systems. There are the following educational standards in Georgia:
- National Curriculum for general education;
- Vocational education standards for vocational education;
Sector documents (benchmarks) on regulated programs of higher education, but can be developed for other fields of study as well.
The new VET Law (2018) defines the standards as follows:
- “ Professional standard - a combination of tasks and responsibilities related to a particular profession";
- “ Vocational education standard - a document that defines qualification / qualifications to be granted, number of credits required for the relevant qualification / qualifications, learning outcomes to be achieved, the combination of those modules the learning outcomes of which are necessary to achieve for the qualification / qualifications to be granted, and prerequisites for admission and implementation of the relevant education program/programs, as well as the areas of employment and requirements for development and implementation of educational program / programs (if any);
- “ Vocational education program - a combination of learning objectives, learning outcomes, module / modules, relevant credits, teaching methods, assessment forms and organizational characteristics. The vocational education program is completed with awarding the qualification relevant to the 3rd / 4th / 5th level of National Qualification Framework and issuance of the diploma;”
The new VET Law (2018) includes important orientations on VET qualifications of all NQF levels (2 to 5), and types of VET qualifications, as follows:
Article 6 of the law of Georgia on Vocational Education provides explanation on vocational training and re-training programmes:
“Vocational education is implemented:
- Through vocational training program, that prepares a person to perform individual tasks and obligations related to the profession. Learning outcomes under the Vocational Training Program may conform to the 2nd / 3rd / 4th / 5th levels of the National Qualifications Framework;
- Through vocational re-training program aimed at acquiring and / or developing competencies in the same field for professional activities. The learning outcomes provided by the vocational re-training program may comply with 2nd / 3rd / 4th / 5th levels of the National Qualifications Framework.
The Law on Vocational Education distinguishes two types of programmes: a) vocational education programmes; b) vocational training and re-training programmes.
Vocational education programmes/qualifications conform to the NQF 3rd, 4th and 5th levels and have the following characteristics:
- These programs are implemented within the education system, i.e. by the institution, holding an educational institution status;
- The admission right to these programmes is based on education system qualifications;
- Studying at this type of program, as a rule, precedes the employment period.
- Educational programme /qualification reflects all categories of the NQF-aligned level descriptors;
- Holding this qualification makes it possible to pursue studies at a higher level, within education system.
Vocational training/re-training qualifications conform with the NQF 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th levels and have the following characteristics:
- These programs are implemented and qualifications are awarded by legal entities outside education system. The entity is not required to get an educational status, although it must be authorized to implement a program and award a qualification. These programs may be implemented by educational institutions as well.
- These programs aim at meeting labor market damands rapidly. A person starts studying at the program after starting job: it is oriented on a little academic workload or on upgrading current skills;
- Admission right is not based on general education qualifications. For example, it is impossible to require minimum basic education qualification for admission to 2nd level training/re-training qualification, dues to the fact that these two qualifications are placed at one and the same level. Although, professional experience or vocational education are required for participating in these programs.
- Learning outcomes of program/qualification fail to reflect all categories/aspects of relevant NQF level. Learning outcomes of vocational training/re-training programmes, out of the purposes of the program, might be focused on the only category of the NQF level, for example, on acquiring necessary skills for labor market. (Additional information can be found in section 2.3).
- This qualification makes horizontal progression possible at NQF same level in correspondence with the recognition of formal education, stipulated by legislation, which, provides a possibility to pursue studies at vocational education program and acquire relevant qualification.
In general education: the National Curriculum is an educational standard of general education. Learning outcomes of basic and complete general education shall correspond with the National Curriculum im compliance with the set rule of legislation.
The National Curriculum comprises subject standards of basic and upper (full) secondary education. According to the National Curriculum glossary of terms- “subject standard” determines the obligatory minimum of knowledge, a student must have upon completion the level. It provides answers to questions: what should a learner know, what is a learner able to do and what are the values a learner should share within the scope of a specific subject”.
The National Curriculum stipulates, that learning outcome is knowledge, which is determined by the glossary of terms as: “synergy of three categories of knowledge: (declarative, procedural and conditional), answering questions of three types: what do I know, how do I perform and when, why, in what case is knowledge applied? The National Curriculum provides broad definition of “knowledge” and the NQF provides narrow definition of knowledge, as knowledge of only facts, principles, theories, concepts, theoretical and practical knowledge. This definition corresponds with “declarative knowledge”, determined by the National Curriculum.
Development process of qualifications
In VET the linkage between various standards and qualifications is as follows: occupational standards, educational standards, VET qualifications. One educational standard can lead to several VET qualifications.
The published information on all VET educational standards that lead to specific VET qualifications is comprehensive and regularly updated.
The description of the educational standard provides the following information (example):
- Name of the Educational Standard: for example Web programmer
- Direction (grouped in 11 directions): Information and communication technologies
- Number of registration: 06108
- Level: V
- Entry requirements: Secondary education
- Credits: 170
- Compulsory VET modules: 20 modules
- Elective VET modules: 1 module
- General compulsory modules: 9 modules
All modules with detailed description of aim of the module, credit, level, learning outcomes, organization of teaching and assessment approach are attached to the document.
Access, progression and credit
The legal document “Ministerial Decree on Regulation of Calculation of credits for educational programs” (Ministerial Decree/Order Nr.3) defines details of use of ECTS credits in Georgian education system. The decree defines ECTS as a student centred system, which relies on Learning Outcomes and transparency of the learning process.
The decree prescribes the hours/ or range of hours for each ECTS as 25-30 hours, defines the workload for an academic year as 60 ECTS, with a maximal amount of 75 ECTS in individual programs. It further defines details of assessment for the entire system including regulations on mandatory intermediate assessment and thresholds for each type of assessment. The assessment should measure learning outcomes defined in the program/course.
Credits are allocated to qualifications and modules based on the size of the qualification or module. According to the VET law (2010) credit expresses amount of work to be done by a vocational student to master one subject. While in the revised law credit expresses the educational workload for a vocational student/listener and which can be obtained through achieving the learning results.
Credits are allocated by Curriculum Working Group members to the educational standard and modules; they use both up-down and top-down processes; one year program is about 60 credits in VET as well as higher education; in the process of allocation credits to individual modules in VET, working groups use the complexity of the learning outcomes; the sum of the credit values of all modules should be very close to the value of the full qualification; if the sum is not the same the working groups revisit the allocation of the credits.
If the programme leading to the qualification is much shorter than other full time VET programmes, a lower credit value may need to be considered. However, national VET qualifications delivered in schools will be of similar duration and therefore of the same credit value. VET providers use educational standards in the process of allocation credits to their educational programs.
In Higher education 240 credits are allocated at Bachelor level (first cycle), 120 at Master level (second cycle) and 180 at Doctor level (third cycle).
The NQF supports the credit system in two ways. First, to support that credit accumulation and transfer are built into the NQF’s requirements for qualifications for approval within the framework. Second, NQF defines requirements for quality assurance that includes monitoring the quality of assessment that helps to build the reliability of credits awarded.
The integration of the credit system within the NQF:

Use of learning outcomes
Introducing a learning outcomes approach is an important part of the national reform programme for general education, VET and higher education, as indicated in the key legal acts. Linked to this is increased interest for validation of non-formal and informal learning.
Higher education and vocational education are more advanced in implementing the learning-outcomes approach; in general education this approach is more recent. The learning outcomes approach is an established and generalised principle in the Georgian education and training system, albeit with varied degree of quality in different sub-sectors and education institutions. The application of the learning outcomes approach is a mandatory requirement of the legislation on quality assurance of education, notably in authorisation and accreditation.
The new VET Law (2018) defines Learning Outcomes as a fundamental principle:
“Z) Learning outcome – a statement regarding the "knowledge and understanding" (which implies results of assimilation of information, facts, principles, theory, theoretical and practical methods of learning or activities) and "skills" (which implies the ability of using the appropriate knowledge to carry out specific assignment and solve the problems), and / or the "responsibility and autonomy" (which means the use of knowledge and skills by the person through appropriate level of values and independence)”.
In VET: since modularisation of the VET programs has started in 2013, all educational standards as well as modular program are based on learning outcomes. The aim was that learning outcomes-based qualifications levels would strengthen the outcomes-dimension and give learning outcomes a prominent role in planning education provision.
In higher education: learning outcomes, and the comparison between learning outcomes abroad and in the country are a key basis for recognition of acquired knowledge (Article 50 of the Law on Higher Education). The Law also prescribes to use learning outcomes for recognition of knowledge and skills acquired for a different qualification.
Learning outcomes are fundamental elements of quality assurance of higher education, mentioned both in authorisation and accreditation standards. Authorisation standards require clearly defined Learning Outcomes aligned with NQF level descriptors. Program accreditation has among its main functions to check feasibility of the outcomes, relevance and correspondence to the existing NQF.
ECTS: another legal document the Ministerial Decree on Regulation of Calculation of credits for educational programs (Ministerial Decree/Order Nr.3) defines details of use of ECTS credits in Georgian academia and the use of learning outcomes as mandatory for higher education. The decree defines ECTS as a student centred system, which relies on Learning Outcomes and transparency of the learning process. It further defines details of assessment for the entire system including regulations on mandatory intermediate assessment and thresholds for each type of assessment. The assessment should measure learning defined in the program/course. The decree prescribes (Article 4. 5) to align/introduce adequacy of assessment for the envisioned Learning Outcomes.
NQF scope and structure
The amended Law of Georgia in on the Development of Quality of Education defines the National Qualifications Framework as an instrument that classifies qualifications for the education sub-systems' (general, vocational and higher education, informal education) integration and coordination, as well as improvement of qualification quality, transparency, availability and development, taking the labour market and social interests into consideration.
The NQF includes quality-assured qualifications from general, vocational and higher education systems.
The new legal base adopted in October 2018 acknowledges the place for qualifications awarded outside of the formal education system, and the new VET Law (2018) places high priority to lifelong learning (training and retraining for better employability). This process of developing the legal base supporting implementation of the VET Law is in its initial phase.
Stakeholder involvement and institutional arrangements
Legal basis of NQF
The first Georgian NQF was adopted by ministerial decree in 2010 and has impacted through its level structure and descriptors the panorama of qualifications in Georgia. This was a sub-divided NQF, based on three sub-frameworks (general, vocational and higher).
In 2017-2018 a major revision of the NQF has taken place, to improve coherence and better linkages between the sub-systems (general education, VET and higher education) and compatibility with EQF. As a result, in October 2018 the Parliament adopted the NQF-related amendments to the Law of Georgia on Development of Educational quality.
There is no single Law fully dedicated to the new NQF. Instead Georgia decided to insert a new chapter in an existing Law: Chapter IV2 (3 articles) of the amended (2018) Law of Georgia on Development of Educational Quality, sets the goals and levels of the new NQF levels, and the role of the new classifier of fields of study.
Simultaneously, in 2017-2018 a package of new legal acts supporting implementation of the new NQF have been drafted and consulted with the stakeholders. The main subordinate acts in form of orders of the Ministry of Education Science Culture and Sport of Georgia (MESCC, see: http://mes.gov.ge/index.php?lang=eng), and rules and methodologies to be approved by the Director of NCEQE, which have developed in 2018 and 2019 are:
In 2018 – for approval:
- Ministerial Order on the 8-level structure of the NQF, level descriptors and list of typical qualifications
- Ministerial Order on the Classifier of Fields of Study, based on ISCED-F 2013
- Ministerial Order on Governance and Monitoring of the NQF
- In 2019 the following acts are planned for finalisation and approval:
- Ministerial Order on rules for development of education programmes aligned with the NQF levels
- Rules for recognition of non-formal education, and related regulations on quality assurance of the education and training institutions delivering such programmes and credentials
- Methodology for levelling programmes’ learning outcomes
- Concept and technical specifications for the new online register of qualifications
- Rules for VET educational standards (to be developed)
The ongoing reform of the NQF is expected to deepen the coherence with the 2017-2018 reforms of the education quality assurance system, enhance transparency and evidence based decision-making on the NQF implementation, and support inclusion of quality-assured qualifications for lifelong learning awarded outside of the formal education sector.
Governance and institutional arrangements for the NQF
The National Centre for Education Quality Enhancement (NCEQE) manages the NQF. Its functions include implementing quality assurance measures; maintaining the register of occupational standards and register of accredited programmes and facilitating social partner engagement, such as in development of occupational standards.
The Ministry of Education and Science defines policy, oversees validation arrangements, authorises establishment of VET providers, and oversees recognition of vocational education received in a foreign country.
Sector councils identify particular components of vocational qualifications, modules and need for development of frameworks/modules of vocational standards; they submit relevant proposals to NCEQE. To date, 11 sector councils have been established in fields including humanities; business, administration and law; engineering; industry, food processing; construction, engineering; information and communication technologies; agriculture, forestry, fishing, veterinary; and healthcare and social care. Each council is composed of seven to nine members. Social partners are represented.
In 2017 and 2018 the debates to improve governance of the new NQF led to a proposal to create a new consultative NQF body, composed of varied stakeholders: the NQF Advisory Board (NQF AB). The mission and full set of functions of this NQF AB are defined as follows in the new draft subordinate act on NQF governance and monitoring:
a) Review strategic directions of the NQF development, elaborate proposals on the amendments to be made and provide recommendations to the Director for the approval.
b) Review the draft action plan for the NQF implementation of its correspondence with the strategic directions of development; elaborate proposals for the changes to be made and provide recommendations to the Director for the approval;
c) Review the performance report of the annual action plan, elaborate proposals for the next action plan and provide recommendations to the Director to consider them;
d) Review the results of periodic, comprehensive monitoring and the draft of a roadmap of further development and implementation of the NQF, elaborate proposals for making changes in it and provide recommendations to the Director for its approval;
e) Review other issues, related to the NQF development and elaborate relevant proposals.
Once this subordinate act is approved, NCEQE and the new NQF Advisory Board will work together to further develop the NQF structure and content, develop learning outcomes-based programs and respective qualifications, transparent inclusion of qualifications into the NQF, defining the format of the electronic qualifications register, and disseminating information for key stakeholders, users and the wider public.
NCEQE has been established as a legal entity of public law by Ministerial order Nr 89/5 of 14/09/2010 to support the promotion of educational quality assurance and improvement. NCEQE has independent management of its functional organisation, staffing and human resource development, and budget.
NCEQE performs its activities on the principles of transparency and publicity. NCEQE’s activities can be grouped in three main components:
a) quality assurance of educational programmes and institutions;
b) support to quality improvement to educational institutions via information and advice;
c) qualifications development and improvement.
Besides, NCEQE hosts the Georgian ENIC-NARIC Centre and recognises foreign qualifications. Supervision over the activities of the NCEQE is administered by the Ministry in accordance with the procedure, envisaged by Law of Georgia on Legal Entities of Public Law. Since 2013 NCEQE has the status of affiliated member European Association for Quality Assurance of Higher Education (ENQA) [6].
Detailed presentation of NCEQE’s organisational structure, functional set-up and staffing are provided in annex 1. The organisational structure is presented at: http://eqe.ge/eng/structure
The governance of the NQF, as a key policy instrument for transparency of qualifications and facilitation of recognition and mobility, is a matter for further debate and development. The new phase of the Georgian NQF opens new opportunities to include qualifications of different types beyond those from formal education, to promote closer links between education and the market demands, and to be better used by all stakeholders groups. These perspectives will require more participative governance and decision-making, and more active dissemination and information among stakeholders.
NCEQE’s Strategy Document 2016-2020 takes account of lessons from the activities carried out in 2013-2016 and responds to international experts’ reviews, notably those conducted in the framework of the Centre’s application for full membership of the ENQA, as well as in the framework of cooperation with European Framework for Quality Management (EFQM) [7]. This Strategy defines key strategic landmarks for organisational development, indispensable to respond to challenges, raise effectiveness, service quality, customer satisfaction, sustainability and reliability as an institution. NCEQE’s Strategy Document pursues the following aims:
- Improve organisational management systems and build capacity of NCEQE, strengthen its institutional independence according to state policy, government priorities and international standards
- Develop outcomes-oriented quality assurance system for educational institutions and programmes and improve relevant services.
- Improve services to support educational institutions.
- Implement the principle of LLL in qualification system, using best international practice to optimise and improve education recognition services.
- Raise awareness about Georgia in the European Higher Education Area, support internationalisation of education.
[5] ENQA: http://www.enqa.eu/index.php/enqa-agencies/affiliates/
Resources and funding
The state budget is the main source of funding of the past and ongoing activities related with NQF operations – coordination, steering and decision making, exercised chiefly by NCEQE.
The development of the new NQF has benefited from some support from international partners, which contributed since 2017 to the debate on the new NQF, through knowledge-sharing and analysis. ETF has been the major partner of NCEQE since 2017, supporting the review of the existing drafts of the new NQF legal base, development of concept and policy notes and draft subordinate acts, the basis of the register of qualifications and of the NQF Handbook.
From 2019 a new EU Twinning project will support NCEQE in further developing the key elements of the quality assurance framework of education (all sub-sectors) and the new NQF. This cooperation will focus on reviewing the legal and regulatory base of quality assurance and the NQF, methodology packages, reinforce capacity, develop the detailed conceptual and technical specifications of the new NQF online register and portal.
Quality assurance of qualifications
In 2005, Georgia joined the Bologna Process and took the responsibility to harmonize its educational system with the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) and to implement higher education quality assurance system. In 2006, the Ministry of Education and Science of Georgia established a quality assurance agency – the National Centre for Educational Accreditation (Order N222, the Ministry of Education and Science), which was authorized to conduct institutional accreditation of higher education institutions of Georgia. The system has been reformed in 2010 aiming at strengthening the role of the external quality assurance and extending the mandate of the quality assurance body.
In this regard, the Law on Educational Quality Enhancement has been introduced. By this law an independent quality assurance body – the National Center for Educational Quality Enhancement (NCEQE) has been established as a legal successor of the National Center for Educational Accreditation. The core functions of the NCEQE are: implementing external quality assurance mechanisms of all educational institutions (higher education institutions (HEI), vocational education institutions and general education institutions) operating in the country, on both institutional and programme level; development of the national qualifications framework; recognition of foreign education.
To fulfill its function of implementation and development of external quality assurance mechanisms for higher education institutions, the NCEQE continuously works on the development of the education quality concept, creates and maintains up-to-dated quality assurance (QA) standards and procedures and ensures relevant mechanisms for their proper implementation. In this regard, several external reviews of the agency’s activities and the external quality assurance mechanisms have been conducted by international peers. The recommendations of the reviews have been considered for the development of the QA system.
Currently, two main external quality assurance mechanisms – authorization of educational institutions and accreditation of educational programmes are in place.
The authorization of higher education institutions is an obligatory for all HEIs in order to be allowed to carry out educational activities and to issue a diploma that is recognized by the state. The procedure identifies the compatibility of educational institutions with authorization standards. The term of the authorization is 6 years after which the HEIs are obliged to go thought the re-authorization procedure in order to continue its activates.
The accreditation of educational programmes determines the compatibility of educational programmes with accreditation standards. Programme accreditation is mandatory only for doctoral programmes and programmes of regulated professions (Medicine, Law, Teacher Education, Veterinary, and Maritime). However, due to the fact that state funding goes only to accredited programmes, 98% (1950 accredited programmes) of all academic programs are accredited.
To ensure the continuous development of education quality and the consideration of the external evaluation results by the HEIs, the NCEQE carries out follow-up monitoring procedures for both educational institutions and educational programmes.
Furthermore, the NCEQE supports the development of internal quality assurance mechanisms of HEIs through providing various capacity building activities, including provision of guidelines, consultations and workshops for HEIs.
In 2015-2017, NCEQE revised the system of higher education quality assurance to strengthen the development-oriented and outcome-based function of quality assurance and to ensure its compliance with the requirements of Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG 2015). Specifically, the quality assurance standards and procedures have been revised; formal procedure of complaints and appeals has been introduced; students, employer representatives and international experts have been involved in the review panels; evaluation reports became publicly available.
In order to foster the proper implementation of the revised QA system special programme the NCEQE carried out pilot evaluations of HEIs, provided capacity building activities to HEIs and experts, and developed review process guidelines. Special programme under the project “Study in Georgia” has been designed to support the above-mentioned activities.
From 2018, the NCEQE has started the system-wide implementation of the revised quality assurance standards and procedures at Georgian higher education institutions.
In VET the key elements of the revised and reinforced quality assurance framework are:
- The main objective of QA reform in VET is to revise authorization standards and procedures in order to bring them in compliance with EQAVET principles and consider context of modular, competence based teaching and assessment approaches including dual education principles.
- New draft authorization standards are mainly based on EQAVET principles.
The agreed changes in VET QA will include:
The new draft QA standards, besides programs, material and human resources, will consider some important issues as strategic planning and development, student services, information resources and financial stability of an institution.
New procedures will introduce institution’s “partial compliance to the standards” assessment, which will enable institution to work on further development without losing an authorization.
New requirements to institutions self-assessment will be introduced which will enable NCEQE to observe institution’s progress between self-assessment periods.
Verification of student assessments will be introduced as an additional QA mechanism.
Milestones for development of VET QA:
New standards and procedures will enter into the force after adoption of new VET law by the parliament, before 2019.
New self-assessment process piloting will take place in 2019 and self-assessment reporting for TVET providers will be mandatory in 2020;
Assessment verification is under piloting in 2018. In 2019 piloting will cover most of providers and in 2020 will become official QA mechanism.
Recognising and validating non-formal and informal learning and learning pathways
Georgian legislation uses the term “informal education” for both non-formal and informal learning. The new VET Law defines informal education in its article 3: “Informal education - a part of a lifelong learning system that implies acquisition of "knowledge and understanding" and / or "skills" and / or "responsibility and autonomy" beyond formal education”. The new VET Law (2018) establishes a clear link between the development of the NQF and creation of validation mechanisms of non-formal learning (Art 2). The amended Law of Georgia on Development of Educational Quality acknowledges the recognition of informal learning as key objective the new NQF, while the new VET Law (2018) gives high priority to lifelong learning (training and retraining for better employability).
In 2018 a policy proposal has been drafted on “Recognition of non-formal education”, to pave the way for further development of a legal base to quality-assure programmes and providers in this domain, and include such qualifications in the NQF.
A decree by the Minister of Education and Science #8/n of 3 February 2011 on “Approving the Conditions and procedures for Recognizing Non-formal and Informal vocational Education” sets out framework regulations with regards to VNFIL in Georgia. The decree allows for recognition of vocational education at levels 1-3, defines the bodies responsible for recognizing informal/nonformal education and describes the framework for recognition and formation of validation/examination committees. The decree delegates definition of exact procedures and rules for validation of evidences (work experience, prior non-formal qualification) and assessment of competencies to bodies responsible for recognition (VET institutions that deliver respective formal education).
The Concept paper on VNFIL developed in 2013, and revised in 2016, a draft guide to recognition and amendments to the Decree prepared and two pilots (in IT and Agriculture) were launched. UNDP and the MCA project (USA) supports Georgia in improving the regulatory framework and the pilot implementation of validation of non-formal and informal learning.
In practical terms: the validation (recognition) of non-formal education in Georgia is currently possible and carried out at General and Vocational education levels.
General Education
A citizen, having acquired general education programmes independently, may receive a state document, verifying general education through so called „externat” rule. This means that any person can apply to relevant authorized body for taking school-leaving examinations and gain qualification.
Vocational education
Recognition of learning outcomes, achieved by non-formal learning is available at the following levels of vocational training/re-training:
- For vocational education qualifications – the NQF 3-5 levels;
- For vocational training/re-training qualifications- the NQF 2-5 levels
It shoud be pointed out that, according to Georgian legislation, definition of non-formal learning implies informal learning as well. In further discussing and developing non-validation of mal learning validation, the following issues are important:
- Possibilities of validation of non-formal education in Georgia
- Bodies authorised for to carry our the different phases of validation
- Interconnections and specific features of the phases of validation
- Outcomes of validation and link to the NQF
NQF implementation
Inclusion of qualifications in a register
All VET qualifications together with occupational standards and Educational standards in Formal education are placed on www.vet.ge and www.eqe.ge. These registers are for public use. As of December 2018 the total number of approved quality assured modular VET programmes (qualifications) included in the register is 97, in 62 sectors and 3 NQF levels (3, 4 and 5).
As of November 2017 the total number of higher education programmes (qualifications) included in the NCEQE register is 1,940 in 12 sectors and all relevant levels. The large majority are in the 3 cycles (Bachelor, Master, Doctoral). This register is not open for public use.
The concept for the new common digital qualifications register was developed in 2018 and will be followed by a new IT system and platform open for users. The concept defines the common structure for any qualification to be inserted in the new qualifications register, which is fully in line with the Annex 6 of the EQF Recommendation (revised in 2017):
Different compulsory and elective fields are defined for qualifications of different sub-systems, but the common information for all qualifications is:
1. Name of the programme
2. Title of the qualification
3. Field of study (ISCED –F-2013)
4. Country code (ISO standard – only in English form)
5. Level of the qualification: (The NQF level)
6. Description of the qualification
a) Learning outcomes:
- Knowledge
- Skills
- Responsibility and autonomy
b) Open text field, describing what the learner is expected to know, understand and able to do upon completion of educational process.
7. Name, address and web-address of awarding institution
8. Credits (ECTS or ECVET)
9. Internal quality assurance processes (Not mandatory)
10. External quality assurance
- Agency, ensuring quality assurance;
- Address, web-address
11. Date of authorization/accreditation and validity terms;
12. Additional information about qualification
13. Source of additional information
14. Qualification URL
15. Access and entry requirements
16. Ways to acquire qualification
17. Opportunities for pursuing studies
18. Terms of validity
19. Qualification-relevant fields of employment: according to ISCO-08 for vocational education, training and re-training qualifications;
Reflecting information in the Register
Information about individual qualification should be entered in the Electronic Register of the NQF on the basis of the external QA procedures, defined by the legislation and after acquiring authorization to grant specific qualification by an educational institution or other legal person. Inclusion of qualification in the NQF is automatically reflected in Qualifications Electronic Registry.
The procedure of registering qualification in Qualifications Register is determined by the Ministerial order “On the NQF Monitoring and Governing”. NCEQE is responsible for registering all quality-assured qualifications.
Considering the Register purposes, it will be bilingual (Georgian and English).
Monitoring, evaluation and review of the NQF
A new subordinate act supporting implementation of the NQF is planned for approval in 2018, which defines the modes of governing and monitoring the NQF.
The new NQF monitoring will comprise two complementary dimensions:
- Ongoing, annual monitoring;
- Periodic, comprehensive monitoring.
Ongoing monitoring aims to support good implementation of tasks defined in the NQF annual action plan. It will also include the evaluation of activities performed according to assessment criteria.
The periodic, comprehensive monitoring will support further NQF development, and be carried out with a periodicity of 4-5 years. A specially formed group will plan and coordinate the activities and analysis of periodic, comprehensive monitoring. The plan for further NQF development is worked out on the basis of the results and conclusions of comprehensive monitoring.
Indicative questions for comprehensive monitoring:
- To what extent does the level descriptor correspond to requirements of educational and employment spheres?
- Do NQF levels correspond to the wide variety of qualifications in the country ?
- Is it necessary to introduce new types of qualifications?
- To what extent are the qualifications defined by the legislation compatible with the country's requirements?
Impact for end-users
The NQF is an important driver of the learning outcomes approach for all sub-sectors of education and training, and currently is increasingly acting as a linkage between formal and non-formal education and training and between the sub-sectors of the formal education system. The experience of NQF implementation has also contributed to interconnect quality-assurance and inclusion of qualifications in the NQF; and to identification of areas of difficult permeability in the education and training continuum.
Referencing to regional frameworks
Georgia has participated in the Bologna process since 2005, but has not yet presented a self- certification report. The structure and level descriptors of the new NQF are fully aligned with the EQF and the FQ of EHEA. The new EQF recommendation, adopted in May 2017 provides for comparison of third country NQFs with the EQF. The EQF advisory group, which steers implementation of the recommendation, shall agree criteria and procedures for this comparison. Georgia is more advanced than other European Neighbourhood countries in readiness to link or benchmark its NQF in this way.
Important lessons and future plans
In 2017-2018 the NQF regained a new impetus as NCEQE and Ministry of Education lead the debate and stakeholders consultation on the new NQF and its implementation mechanisms.
The 2010 National Qualifications Framework (NQF) [8] is undergoing a substantial reform in conceptual and structural terms. In 2018 the legislator is expected to adopt the NQF-related amendments to the Law of Georgia on Development of Educational Quality [9]. NCEQE management recognises that implementation of the revised NQF legislation will require effective planning of key steps; coherence and coordination with the QA reforms; as well as improved capacity at NCEQE (human resources, instruments, and information) to ascertain that the NQF stimulates transparency of qualifications, permeability and the necessary interaction between qualifications and the world of work (demand for skills and qualifications).
The governance of the NQF, as a key policy instrument for transparency of qualifications and facilitation of recognition and mobility, is a matter for further debate and development. These perspectives will require more participative governance and decision-making, and more active dissemination and information among stakeholders.
NCEQE coordinates the activity of the Sector Councils. The Sector Councils need further support and reorganisation to strengthen their capacity to deliver the expected contribution for high quality programmes and qualifications. The future legal status and sustainability of these Sector Councils is yet to be decided.
NCEQE prepares the new QA rules and procedures, and is responsible for the adequate implementation of accreditation and authorisation processes with participation of the relevant actors (experts’ teams and decision-making Councils). But effective implementation of the new and revised procedures is challenging, as it requires enhanced capacity at NCEQE, efficient procedures, improved information and support documentation (handbooks and methodological support) for the stakeholders and practitioners; and establishment of monitoring instruments to gather feedback and data necessary for review and recalibration of the new QA mechanisms.
The reforms of QA and NQF have commonalities, as both concern the entire system of education and training, and express the country’s determination to improve the compatibility with similar developments in the EU and beyond. NCEQE is the key implementing body of education QA and the NQF, and its resources (human, technical), organisation and leadership will be under pressure to deliver the expected improvements in processes and outcomes.
NCEQE is called to join and cooperate with a range of international developments related with recognition of qualifications, driven by the digital revolution (credentials from online courses and programmes) as well as by mass movement of people (migrants and refugees), such as recognition of qualifications of refuges without documented qualifications. Some of these issues will be discussed / developed in the frame of the upcoming EU Twinning project (from 2019).
[8] The key legal acts of the NQF 2010, now being reformed, are accessible at: http://eqe.ge/eng/static/125/education-system/national-qualifications-framework
[9] Current (not yet amended) version of the Law available at: http://eqe.gov.ge/res/docs/2014120816015474706.pdf
Abbreviations
EP Eastern Partnership
ECVET European credit system for vocational education and training
EQAVET European quality assurance in vocational education and training
EQF European qualifications framework
ISCED international standard classification of education
NCEQE National Centre for Educational Quality Enhancement
NEETs young people not in employment, education or training
NQF national qualifications framework
QF - EHEA qualifications framework for the European higher education area
SME small and medium-sized enterprise
VET vocational education and training
VNFIL validation of non-formal and informal learning
Please log in or sign up to comment.